Applied Human RightsArtistic freedom operates within
complex networks of recognition and legitimacy, with contemporary discourse highlighting two contentious subjects: Cancel
Culture and Cultural Appropriation.
Cancel Culture, a phenomenon scrutinizing artists’ ethical conduct, sparks debates
about the separation of an artist’s work from their personal behavior. Historically, artistic autonomy was grounded in the
archetype of the artist-genius, accountable solely to future judgment. However, this paradigm is now challenged by concepts
like the “Death of the Author” (Barthes 1967), which suggests that an artist detaches from their work, enabling it to evolve
independently. While it values artistic autonomy, it often leans into a male-dominated theoretical tradition accentuating
independence.
Cultural Appropriation raises different concerns, revolving around
the respectful use of elements from cultures not one’s own. The line between appreciation and appropriation is thin, leading
to tensions when aspects of a culture are employed without due acknowledgment, understanding, or permission. Navigating this
issue necessitates distinguishing between genuine cross-cultural engagement that enriches the art world and exploitation or
disrespect.
Balancing artistic freedom with responsibility is the crux of these matters. Achieving this equilibrium
requires open and respectful dialogues among artists, critics, and affected communities.
